부실한 세계보건기구의 보고서

코로나바이러스의 기원에 대하여 중국의 방해로 정확한 규명을 하지 못할 것이라는 추측이 딱 들어맞았습니다.

 

중국은 세계 219개국에서 1억 2790만 건의 코로나바이러스 감염자와 280만 명의 사망자를 보고했는데도 지금까지 사과나 보상 카드는 꺼내지 않고 있습니다.

 

중국은 오히려 세계의 비난을 피하기 위하여 미국 병사에 의해 시작되었다고 말해 보았다가 지금은 수입된 냉동식품에서 기원되었다며 무한 실험실에서의 유출이나 박쥐를 통한 기원설을 부인하고 있습니다.

 

세계보건기구(WHO)는 조류독감이 중간 동물 숙주를 통해 확산되는 시나리오, 즉 포획 후 농장에서 사육되는 야생동물을 통해 확산되는 시나리오가 "매우 가능성이 높다.고 합니다. 그 조사는 어떤 다른 동물이 박쥐에 감염되었는지 발견하지 못했다는 보고서를 내놓았습니다.

세계보건기구도 코로나바이러스의 가장 유력한 원천으로 여겨지는 숙주가 도내체 어디에서 시작되었고 어떻게 사람에게 전염시켰을지도 모른다는 부실한 보고서를 내놓은 것입니다.

 

이에 대해 미국을 비롯한 호주, 캐나다, 체코, 덴마크, 에스토니아, 이스라엘, 일본, 라트비아, 리투아니아, 노르웨이, 대한민국, 슬로베니아, 영국은 공동성명을 통하여 세계보건기구 전문가들의 연구가 코로나바이러스 전염병이 어떻게 시작되고 확산되었는지를 이해하는 데 매우 중요한데 "완전하고 원본적인 데이터와 샘플에 대한 접근이 상당히 지연되고 부족했다"고 언급했습니다.

 

다음은 cnn에 실린 기사 원문입니다.

 

 

미국 맥악관 젠 파기 비서는 세계보건기구가 내놓은 보고서에 대하여 전염병이 한 동물에서 다른 동물로, 그리고 그 다음에 사람에게 전염되는 것으로부터 시작되었을 가능성이 매우 높다고 말했으며, 조 바이든 대통령은 미국인들이 코로나19의 기원과 지구촌으로부터의 추가 조치에 대해 "더 나은 정보를 얻을 자격이 있다"고 믿고 있다고 말했습니다.

President Joe Biden believes Americans "deserve better information" about the origin of Covid-19 and further steps from the global community, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday after the release of a World Health Organization report that said the pandemic is very likely to have started with transmission from one animal to another, and then to humans.

파키는 백악관 브리핑에서 "그는 미국 국민, 지구촌, 의료 전문가, 의사들, 생명을 구하기 위해 노력해 온 모든 사람들, 사랑하는 사람들을 잃은 모든 사람들이 더 큰 투명성을 가질 자격이 있다고 생각한다"고 말했습니다. 

"I think he believes the American people, the global community, the medical experts, the doctors -- all of the people who have been working to save lives, the families who have lost loved ones -- all deserve greater transparency," Psaki told reporters at a White House briefing. 

그녀는 미국을 비롯한 12개국이 WHO 보고서에 대해 의문을 제기하며 독립적이고 완전히 투명한 평가를 요구하는 공동성명을 발표한 직후, 유럽연합(EU)이 연구원들의 접근성 향상과 추가 조사를 촉구한 직후 이같이 말했다. 

She spoke shortly after the US and 12 other countries released a joint statement raising questions about the WHO report and calling for independent and fully transparent evaluations, and the European Union called for better access for researchers and further investigation. 

미국 당국은 219개국에서 중국이 2019년 12월 세계보건기구(WHO)에 첫 발병 사례를 보고한 이후 약 1억2790만 건의 코로나19 감염자와 280만 명의 사망자를 보고했습니다, 존스 홉킨스 대학에 따르면 3천만 명 이상의 미국인들이 병에 걸렸고 55만 명 이상이 사망했습니다.

Authorities in 219 countries and territories have reported about 129.9 million Covid-19 cases and 2.8 million deaths since China reported its first cases to the WHO in December 2019. More than 30 million Americans have fallen ill and more than 550,000 have died, according to Johns Hopkins University.

"그들은 더 나은 정보를 얻을 자격이 있습니다,"라고 Psaki는 미국인들에 대해 말했습니다. 

"그들은 그것을 제공하기 위해 지구촌이 취한 조치들을 받을 자격이 있습니다." 그녀는 계속해서 중국의 투명성 결여를 비판했고, 중국이 세계 사회에 자료와 답을 제공해 줄 것을 요구했습니다. 

"They deserve better information," Psaki said of Americans. "They deserve steps that are taken by the global community to provide that." She went on to criticize China for its lack of transparency and called on Beijing to provide data and answers to the global community. 

세계보건기구(WHO) 120쪽 분량의 보고서는 조류독감이 중간 동물 숙주를 통해 확산되는 시나리오, 즉 포획 후 농장에서 사육되는 야생동물을 통해 확산되는 시나리오가 "매우 가능성이 높다.고 합니다. 그 조사는 어떤 다른 동물이 박쥐에 감염되었는지 발견하지 못했습니다.

바이러스의 가장 유력한 원천으로 여겨지는 - 그리고 나서 그것을 사람에게 전염시켰을지도 모른다.고 했습니다.The 120-page who report, released Tuesday, says a scenario where the virus spread via an intermediate animal host, possibly a wild animal captured and then raised on a farm, is "very likely." The investigation has not found what other animal was infected by a bat -- considered the most likely original source of the virus -- and then may have transmitted it to a human.


또 다른 가능한 시나리오는 박쥐나 판골린과 같은 유사한 코로나 바이러스를 옮기는 것으로 알려진 동물 중 한 동물로부터 직접 전염되는 것입니다.
두 가지 다른 시나리오는 가능성이 없는 것으로 간주되었습니다. 보고서는 차가운 식품을 통한 도입은 "가능한 경로"이며, 실험실 사건을 통한 도입은 "극히 가능성이 없는 경로"로 간주되었다고 말합니다.

Another possible-to-likely scenario is direct transmission from one of the animals known to carry a similar coronavirus, such as a bat or a pangolin.

Two other scenarios were considered unlikely. The report says introduction through cold food products is a "possible pathway" and introduction through a laboratory incident was considered to be "an extremely unlikely pathway."

테드로스 아다놈 게브레예수스 세계보건기구(WHO) 사무총장은 9일(현지시간) "가장 가능성이 낮은 가설"이라고 결론지었다고 밝혔습니다. 

그럼에도 불구하고, 그는 그 기관이 가능성을 계속 탐색할 것이라고 말했습니다.

There is no evidence to support the lab theory, and World Health Organization Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Tuesday that the WHO team concluded it was the "least likely hypothesis." 

Nevertheless, he said the agency would continue to explore the possibility.

테드로스는 자신의 발언 사본에 따르면 "팀원들은 우한에 있는 여러 실험실을 방문했고 실험실의 사고로 인해 바이러스가 인구에 유입됐을 가능성을 고려했다"고 밝혔습니다.

테드로스는 "연구진이 실험실 유출이 가장 가능성이 낮은 가설이라고 결론지었지만, 전문가 관련 추가 임무가 있을 가능성이 있어 추가 조사가 필요하다"고 말했습니다. 그는 WHO의 평가가 "충분히 광범위하다고 생각하지 않았다"고 덧붙였습니다. 보다 강력한 결론에 도달하기 위해서는 추가적인 데이터와 연구가 필요할 것입니다.

"The team also visited several laboratories in Wuhan and considered the possibility that the virus entered the human population as a result of a laboratory incident," Tedros told member states in a briefing about the report, according a copy of his remarks.

"Although the team has concluded that a laboratory leak is the least likely hypothesis, this requires further investigation, potentially with additional missions involving specialist experts, which I am ready to deploy," Tedros said. He added that he didn't believe the WHO assessment "was extensive enough. Further data and studies will be needed to reach more robust conclusions."

파키는 화요일, "전문가로부터 현재까지 수행된 분석은 그녀가 언급한 가설을 구체화하지 않은 채 하나의 가설을 추가로 지지하는 우려"를 언급했습니다. 세계보건기구의 보고서는 "6개월에서 9개월 전에 우리가 그 기원에 대해 가졌던 것보다 더 깊은 이해나 더 큰 지식으로 우리를 이끌지 못한다. 그것은 또한 앞으로 이런 일이 일어나지 않도록 어떻게 예방해야 하는지에 대한 지침이나 조치들을 제공하지 않은다,"라고 그녀는 말했습니다. 

Psaki said Tuesday that "the analysis performed to date from our experts -- their concern is that there is an additional support for one hypothesis," without specifying which one she was referring to. The WHO report "doesn't lead us to any closer of an understanding or greater knowledge than we had six to nine months ago about the origin. It also doesn't provide us guidelines or steps on how we should prevent this from happening in the future," she said. 

세계보건기구의 보고서, Psaki의 논평, 미국과 동맹국들 그리고 EU의 성명은, 특히 코로나 바이러스의 기원에 대한 미국과 중국간의 몇 달간의 긴장 상태를 따르고 있습니다. 중국은 처음에 조류독감에 대한 초기 보고는 대수롭지 않게 여겼는데, 심지어 수백만 명의 중국인들이 설을 축하하기 위해 전국으로 퍼져나갔음에도 불구하고 대중에게 경고하려는 과학자들을 비난하기까지 했습니다. 

The WHO report, Psaki's comments and the statements by the US and allies and the EU follow months of tension, particularly between the US and China, over the origins of the coronavirus. China initially downplayed early reports of the virus, going so far as to censure scientists who tried to warn the public, even as millions of Chinese spread across the country for Lunar New Year celebrations. 

세계보건기구(WHO)의 초기 성명은 중국의 발언과 밀접하게 일치해 국제기구의 부실을 잘못된 평가로 돌렸습니다. 세계보건기구(WHO)가 먼저 공중보건 비상사태를 선포한 뒤 대유행이라며 늑장을 부린 것은 트럼프 행정부 관리들에게 신뢰성과 독립성에 의문을 제기하게 했습니다. 미국 의원들은 중국이 WHO의 조기 대응을 조작했는지, 트럼프 백악관은 바이든 행정부가 이후 복권한 이 기구에 대한 자금 지원을 삭감했는지에 대한 조사를 촉구했습니다. 

Early WHO statements closely echoed China's, putting the global agency's imprimatur on faulty evaluations. The WHO's delay first in declaring the virus a public health emergency, and then in calling it a pandemic, prompted Trump administration officials to raise questions about its credibility and independence. US lawmakers called for an investigation into whether China manipulated the WHO's early response and the Trump White House cut funding for the organization, which the Biden administration has since reinstated. 

그러나 WHO의 독립성에 대한 우려는 여전하며, 다양한 나라 외교관의 반응과 화요일 성명은 그들이 미국에 국한된 것이 아니라는 것을 분명히 했습니다.

한 유럽 외교관은 세계보건기구(WHO)의 지상에 파견된 것은 "첫 번째 단계일 뿐"이라며 "바이러스 원인에 대한 명확한 결과를 얻기 위해서는 추가적인 연구가 필요하며 데이터와 샘플에 대한 접근이 더 필요하다"고 말했습니다.

Concerns about WHO independence remain, however, and the reactions of diplomats from a variety of countries and Tuesday's statements made clear they are not limited to the US.

One European diplomat said the presence of a WHO mission on the ground and the report were "only a first step, we need further studies to come to a clear result concerning the origin of the virus and we need more access to data and samples."

 

CNN과 통화한 다른 특사단의 견해를 반영한 또 다른 유럽 외교관은 "공동성명은 이전 정부 때처럼 공격적이지 않다"며 "이는 지지하기 쉽게 만들었다고 추측하지만, 그 성명은 더 강경했을 수 있고 중국의 반응은 좋지 않았다"고 말했습니다. 

"The joint statement is not as aggressive as it might have been under the previous administration, I suspect, which made it easier to support, but the statement could have been tougher and the Chinese response to the process has not been good enough," said another European diplomat, who reflected the views of other envoys who spoke to CNN. 

"중요한 것은 다음 단계는 어떻게 할 것이냐는 것입니다. 이 외교관은 "문제가 있을 때 교훈을 얻고 신속하게 대응할 수 있는 실무체계가 없다면 사람을 보호할 실무체계가 없을 것"이라고 말했습니다. "우리가 세계가 더 건강하고 안전하게 되는 것을 본 곳은 여러분이 교훈을 배우고 문제를 매우 빠르게 처리할 수 있는 정말 명확한 시스템을 가지고 있는 곳입니다. 그리고 만약 우리가 중국과 비슷한 접근 방식을 다시 보게 된다면, 우리는 감당할 수 없는 또 다른 문제를 겪게 될 것입니다." 

"The point is what do the next steps look like? If we don't have a working system to learn lessons and respond quickly when there are problems, we're not going to have a working system to protect people," this diplomat said. "Where we've seen the world get healthier and safer is where you have a really clear system for learning lessons and dealing with problems very quickly and if we see an approach that is similar to China's again, we're going to have another problem that's unmanageable." 

호주, 캐나다, 체코, 덴마크, 에스토니아, 이스라엘, 일본, 라트비아, 리투아니아, 노르웨이, 대한민국, 슬로베니아, 영국 정부가 모두 미국과의 공동성명에 서명했다. 

공동성명은 세계보건기구 전문가들의 연구를 코로나19 전염병이 어떻게 시작되고 확산되었는지를 이해하는 데 매우 중요하다고 설명하면서도, 기관의 보고서의 단점을 지적하면서, "완전하고 원본적인 데이터와 샘플에 대한 접근이 상당히 지연되고 부족했다"고 설명했다. 

The governments of Australia, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Slovenia and the United Kingdom all signed on to the joint statement with the US. 

While describing the work of WHO experts as critical to understanding how the Covid-19 pandemic started and spread, the joint statement pointed to shortcomings in the agency's report, describing it as "significantly delayed and lacked access to complete, original data and samples." 

이어 "최근 WHO가 중국에서 진행한 연구와 관련해 공통된 우려를 표명하는 동시에 향후 이러한 원인 불명의 발생에 대한 국제적 평가를 위해 신속하고 효과적이며 투명한 과학 기반의 독립적 프로세스의 개발과 이용을 위해 협력하는 것이 중요하다"고 강조했습니다.

"We join in expressing shared concerns regarding the recent WHO-convened study in China, while at the same time reinforcing the importance of working together toward the development and use of a swift, effective, transparent, science-based, and independent process for international evaluations of such outbreaks of unknown origin in the future." 

유럽연합은 같은 우려를 약간 더 부드러운 언어로 표현하면서 자체 성명을 발표했다. "바이러스의 기원과 감염 인구에 대한 철저한 검토를 통해서만 우리는 이 전염병을 더 잘 이해하고 통제할 수 있을 것이고, 미래의 건강 비상 사태를 더 잘 예방하고 대비할 수 있을 것입니다,"라고 그것은 추가 조사와 더 나은 접근을 촉구하기 전에 말했습니다. 

The European Union issued its own statement, expressing the same concerns in slightly softer language. "Only through a thorough review of the origins of the virus and its transmission into the human population, will we be able to better understand and control this pandemic, and to better prevent and prepare for future health emergencies," it said, before urging further investigation and better access. 

"연구의 늦은 시작과 전문가들의 지연된 배치 그리고 초기 샘플과 관련 데이터의 제한된 가용성에 대해 유감스럽게 생각하지만, 우리는 현재까지 수행된 작업과 오늘 발표된 보고서를 유용한 첫 단계로 간주한다"고 말했습니다.

"While regretting the late start of the study, the delayed deployment of the experts and the limited availability of early samples and related data, we consider the work carried out to date and the report released today as a helpful first step," it said.